Detail information
| ID |
ENCL000120 
|
||||||||
| Year | 2006 | ||||||||
| Surgery | Operation in Upper Limbs | ||||||||
| Experimental Description | One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for operation in upper limbs were randomly divided into group A and group B, 60 in each group. Bupivacaine 25 ml (0.375% in concentration) was used to block intermuscular plexus brachialis in the operation for anesthesia and EAAD was used for adjunctive localizing in group A, while in group B paresthesia elicitation was used. | ||||||||
| Sample Count | 120 | ||||||||
| Age | 15-55 | ||||||||
| Control |
Std paresthesia elicitation group(n=60)
|
||||||||
| Experiment | Bupivacaine and EAAD group(n=60) | ||||||||
| Indicator | Vital signs Anesthesia conditions Nerve block effects | ||||||||
| Auxiliary Medication | Atropine;Sodium Phenobarbital;Bupivacaine | ||||||||
| Stimulation Method | EA | ||||||||
| Anesthesia Method |
AAA |
||||||||
| Clinical Trial Type | randomly | ||||||||
| Adverse Effects | There were no adverse reactions or complications such as local anesthetic toxicity, pneumothorax, or nerve damage in either group. | ||||||||
| Contraindications | Those with concurrent other traumas or other traumas that have not been cured; Those with infection or scars on the affected side of the neck | ||||||||
| Effector |
In group A, the blocking was complete in 56 cases and incomplete in 4, the anesthesia effect was superior to that in group B, complete in 46, incomplete in 9, and of inefficient in 5 (P < 0.01). EAAD provides a localizing method for plexus brachialis blocking more precise than paresthesia elicitation. Positive
|
||||||||
| Literature |
|