|
Basic Characteristics of Mutations
|
|
Mutation Site
|
L180M |
|
Mutation Site Sentence
|
The patterns of genotypic resistance to ETV were as follows: L180M + M204V + S202G (n=3); M204I + V173M (n=1); I169V + V173M (n=1); L180M + M204V + V173L (n=1); L180M + M204V + V173L + M250V (n=1); M204I + V214A + P237H (n=1). |
|
Mutation Level
|
Amino acid level |
|
Mutation Type
|
Nonsynonymous substitution |
|
Gene/Protein/Region
|
RT |
|
Standardized Encoding Gene
|
P
|
|
Genotype/Subtype
|
C |
|
Viral Reference
|
-
|
|
Functional Impact and Mechanisms
|
|
Disease
|
Hepatitis B, Chronic
|
|
Immune
|
- |
|
Target Gene
|
-
|
|
Clinical and Epidemiological Correlations
|
|
Clinical Information
|
Y |
|
Treatment
|
Entecavir(ETV) |
|
Location
|
- |
|
Literature Information
|
|
PMID
|
28870025
|
|
Title
|
Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic hepatitis B who developed genotypic resistance to entecavir: Real-life experience
|
|
Author
|
Kim HJ,Cho YK,Jeon WK,Kim BI
|
|
Journal
|
Clinical and molecular hepatology
|
|
Journal Info
|
2017 Dec;23(4):323-330
|
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who developed genotypic resistance to entecavir (ETV) were compared to those without resistance. METHODS: Two hundred fifty eight CHB patients who underwent ETV treatment in our institution from July 2007 to May 2013 were included. RESULTS: Eight (3.1%) patients developed genotypic resistance to ETV during the follow-up period. The patterns of genotypic resistance to ETV were as follows: L180M + M204V + S202G (n=3); M204I + V173M (n=1); I169V + V173M (n=1); L180M + M204V + V173L (n=1); L180M + M204V + V173L + M250V (n=1); M204I + V214A + P237H (n=1). The cumulative occurrence rates of genotypic resistance to ETV were not significantly different between CHB patients with prior nucleos(t)tide analogues (NA) exposure (NA experienced, n=56) and NA naive patients (n=202, P=0.823 by log rank comparison). Older age, higher baseline log10hepatitis B virus-deoxynucleic acid (log10HBV-DNA), higher log10HBV-DNA at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after baseline, and complete virologic response (CVR, undetectable serum HBV-DNA by polymerase chain reaction 6 months after ETV treatment) were significant contributors to the development of genotypic resistance to ETV. Multivariate analyses showed higher log10HBV-DNA 6 months after baseline and absence of CVR were independent and significant contributors to the development of ETV resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics of patients who developed ETV resistance were higher log10HBV-DNA 6 months after baseline and absence of CVR during the ETV treatment.
|
|
Sequence Data
|
-
|