|
Basic Characteristics of Mutations
|
|
Mutation Site
|
M184I |
|
Mutation Site Sentence
|
Differential detection of M184V/I between plasma historical HIV genotypes and HIV proviral DNA from PBMCs. |
|
Mutation Level
|
Amino acid level |
|
Mutation Type
|
Nonsynonymous substitution |
|
Gene/Protein/Region
|
RT |
|
Standardized Encoding Gene
|
gag-pol:155348
|
|
Genotype/Subtype
|
HIV-1 |
|
Viral Reference
|
-
|
|
Functional Impact and Mechanisms
|
|
Disease
|
HIV Infections
|
|
Immune
|
- |
|
Target Gene
|
-
|
|
Clinical and Epidemiological Correlations
|
|
Clinical Information
|
- |
|
Treatment
|
lamivudine (LAM);emtricitabine (FTC) |
|
Location
|
- |
|
Literature Information
|
|
PMID
|
32413134
|
|
Title
|
Differential detection of M184V/I between plasma historical HIV genotypes and HIV proviral DNA from PBMCs
|
|
Author
|
Margot N,Ram R,McNicholl I,Haubrich R,Callebaut C
|
|
Journal
|
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
|
|
Journal Info
|
2020 Aug 1;75(8):2249-2252
|
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND: The M184V/I reverse transcriptase mutation, which confers major resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine, is still quite frequent in people living with HIV. The underlying presence of the M184V/I mutation may undermine virological outcomes of ART, particularly in the context of proposed treatment with two-drug combinations that include drugs affected by M184V, such as lamivudine. In suppressed patients for whom historical data are seldom available, resistance assays evaluating integrated viral DNA can help select a fully active switch regimen. OBJECTIVES: To compare detectability of M184V/I in historical HIV-1 RNA analyses versus HIV-1 DNA sequencing. METHODS: We analysed the detection of the M184V/I mutation in a prospective study and compared HIV historical genotypes (plasma) versus integrated HIV DNA (PBMCs) obtained via a validated commercial proviral HIV DNA assay. Eligible participants had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for >/=6 consecutive months prior to screening. A plasma historical genotypic report (HGR) showing the presence of M184V/I was required for all participants and proviral HIV DNA analysis was conducted prior to enrolment. RESULTS: All 84 participants had evidence of M184V or M184I in their HGR (100%), whereas the mutation was detected in only 40/84 participants by proviral HIV DNA sequencing analysis (48%). Differential detection of M184V/I was not associated with timing differences between the HGR and proviral HIV DNA sampling, the overall duration of ART, or CD4 cell counts and HIV-1 viral load at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that undetected M184V/I should be considered when switching virologically suppressed patients to new regimens, particularly two-drug lamivudine- or emtricitabine-containing combinations.
|
|
Sequence Data
|
-
|