|
Basic Characteristics of Mutations
|
|
Mutation Site
|
S147G |
|
Mutation Site Sentence
|
Both were superior to DTG, as evidenced by the data obtained with the IN mutant T66I/L74M/E138K/S147G/Q148R/S230N, which was selected by CAB using an EVG-resistant lab strain. |
|
Mutation Level
|
Amino acid level |
|
Mutation Type
|
Nonsynonymous substitution |
|
Gene/Protein/Region
|
IN |
|
Standardized Encoding Gene
|
gag-pol:155348
|
|
Genotype/Subtype
|
HIV-1 |
|
Viral Reference
|
-
|
|
Functional Impact and Mechanisms
|
|
Disease
|
HIV Infections
|
|
Immune
|
- |
|
Target Gene
|
-
|
|
Clinical and Epidemiological Correlations
|
|
Clinical Information
|
- |
|
Treatment
|
INSTIs;raltegravir (RAL);elvitegravir (EVG) |
|
Location
|
- |
|
Literature Information
|
|
PMID
|
32601157
|
|
Title
|
HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors That Are Active against Drug-Resistant Integrase Mutants
|
|
Author
|
Smith SJ,Zhao XZ,Passos DO,Lyumkis D,Burke TR Jr,Hughes SH
|
|
Journal
|
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
|
|
Journal Info
|
2020 Aug 20;64(9):e00611-20
|
|
Abstract
|
The currently recommended first-line therapy for HIV-1-infected patients is an integrase (IN) strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), either dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC), in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Both DTG and BIC potently inhibit most INSTI-resistant IN mutants selected by the INSTIs raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG). BIC has not been reported to select for resistance in treatment-naive patients, and DTG has selected for a small number of resistant viruses in treatment-naive patients. However, some patients who had viruses with substitutions selected by RAL and EVG responded poorly when switched to DTG-based therapies, and there are mutants that cause a considerable decrease in the potencies of DTG and BIC in in vitro assays. The new INSTI cabotegravir (CAB), which is in late-stage clinical trials, has been shown to select for novel resistant mutants in vitro Thus, it is important to develop new and improved INSTIs that are effective against all the known resistant mutants. This led us to test our best inhibitors, in parallel with DTG, BIC, and CAB, in a single-round infection assay against a panel of the new CAB-resistant mutants. Of the INSTIs we tested, BIC and our compound 4d had the broadest efficacy. Both were superior to DTG, as evidenced by the data obtained with the IN mutant T66I/L74M/E138K/S147G/Q148R/S230N, which was selected by CAB using an EVG-resistant lab strain. These results support the preclinical development of compound 4d and provide information that can be used in the design of additional INSTIs that will be effective against a broad spectrum of resistant mutants.
|
|
Sequence Data
|
-
|