|
Basic Characteristics of Mutations
|
|
Mutation Site
|
T95I |
|
Mutation Site Sentence
|
Indeed, extensive genomic analysis revealed several mutations specifically associated with immunosuppression status, such as S: T95I, S:N764K, M:Q19E and ORF10:L37F. |
|
Mutation Level
|
Amino acid level |
|
Mutation Type
|
Nonsynonymous substitution |
|
Gene/Protein/Region
|
S |
|
Standardized Encoding Gene
|
S
|
|
Genotype/Subtype
|
- |
|
Viral Reference
|
-
|
|
Functional Impact and Mechanisms
|
|
Disease
|
COVID-19
|
|
Immune
|
- |
|
Target Gene
|
-
|
|
Clinical and Epidemiological Correlations
|
|
Clinical Information
|
Y |
|
Treatment
|
- |
|
Location
|
France |
|
Literature Information
|
|
PMID
|
40281619
|
|
Title
|
SARS-CoV-2 lineage-dependent temporal phylogenetic distribution and viral load in immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals
|
|
Author
|
Zafilaza K,Fauchois A,Leducq V,Coppee R,Guilbaud R,Yusti AF,Todesco E,Bridier-Nahmias A,Hingrat QL,Choquet S,Cacoub P,Amoura Z,Barrou B,Pourcher V,Spano JP,Louet M,Kramer L,Goulenok T,Salpin M,Daugas E,Dorent R,Ottaviani S,Zalcman G,Ghosn J,Charpentier C,Descamps D,Marcelin AG,Calvez V,Ferre VM,Marot S,Soulie C
|
|
Journal
|
Virology journal
|
|
Journal Info
|
2025 Apr 25;22(1):118
|
|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVES: Mutational dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised hosts, although well documented, remain a relatively unexplored mechanism. This study aims to compare the viral replication load and genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised patients and non-immunocompromised individuals (NICs) from two major hospitals in Paris from January 2021 to May 2023. METHODS: Cycle threshold (CT) values were measured by TaqPath COVID-19 RT-PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The SARS-CoV-2 whole-genomes from 683 immunocompromised patients and 296 NICs was sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Technologies and used to determine lineage and mutational profile. RESULTS: All immunocompromised patients, but not oncology patients, had lower SARS-CoV-2 viral loads than NICs. The genetic distribution of SARS-CoV-2 was homogeneous between immunocompromised individuals and NICs, with more mutations in immunocompromised patients (IRR = 1,013). Indeed, extensive genomic analysis revealed several mutations specifically associated with immunosuppression status, such as S: T95I, S:N764K, M:Q19E and ORF10:L37F. Conversely, the S: R346K and NSP13:T127N mutations were more common in NICs. CONCLUSION: Immunocompromised patients have lower viral loads, probably due to their later diagnosis compared to NICs and oncology patients, who have better access to on-site SARS-CoV-2 testing and follow-up. In addition, mutational profiles differ between the two groups, with immunocompromised hosts accumulating more mutations compared to NICs.
|
|
Sequence Data
|
-
|
|
|