|
Basic Characteristics of Mutations
|
|
Mutation Site
|
Y93H |
|
Mutation Site Sentence
|
Pre-existing minor variants with NS5A L31M/V-Y93H double substitution are closely linked to virologic failure with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir treatment for genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection |
|
Mutation Level
|
Amino acid level |
|
Mutation Type
|
Nonsynonymous substitution |
|
Gene/Protein/Region
|
NS5A |
|
Standardized Encoding Gene
|
NS5A
|
|
Genotype/Subtype
|
1b |
|
Viral Reference
|
-
|
|
Functional Impact and Mechanisms
|
|
Disease
|
HCV Infection
|
|
Immune
|
- |
|
Target Gene
|
-
|
|
Clinical and Epidemiological Correlations
|
|
Clinical Information
|
Y |
|
Treatment
|
- |
|
Location
|
Japan |
|
Literature Information
|
|
PMID
|
32544182
|
|
Title
|
Pre-existing minor variants with NS5A L31M/V-Y93H double substitution are closely linked to virologic failure with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir treatment for genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection
|
|
Author
|
Morishita N,Sakamori R,Yamada T,Kai Y,Tahata Y,Urabe A,Yamada R,Kodama T,Hikita H,Doi Y,Tamura S,Hagiwara H,Imai Y,Iio S,Tatsumi T,Takehara T
|
|
Journal
|
PloS one
|
|
Journal Info
|
2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234811
|
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND: L31 and Y93 in the NS5A region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most important substitution positions associated with resistance to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment. METHODS: We analyzed the frequency of NS5A L31M/V and Y93/H in NS5A inhibitor-naive HCV genotype 1 patients who received asunaprevir plus daclatasvir combination treatment using a conventional sequencing method and a deep sequencing method that can distinguish a single substitution at either position and a double substitution at both positions with a 0.1% detection threshold. RESULTS: The frequency of substitutions at both sites using the conventional method was very low, with 1 in 14 non-responders and 0 in 42 randomly selected responder patients. On the other hand, for the deep sequencing method, cases with double substitutions in the tandem sequence were detected in 8/14 non-responders and 1/42 responders (p<0.0001). For the conventional method, substitutions were detected at any position in 6/14 non-responders and 2/42 responders (p = 0.0019), with a clear difference between the two groups. The difference was also clear with the deep sequencing method, with 11/14 non-responders and 8/42 responders. Interestingly, for the deep sequencing method, the single substitution of L31 was found in 6/14 non-responders and 7/42 responders, whereas single substitutions of Y93 or double substitutions were found in 7/14 vs. 1/42 and 8/14 vs. 1/42 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NS5A L31 and Y93 substitutions were detected in tandem by the deep sequencing methods in several genotype 1 patients, who may be more resistant to DAA treatment containing an NS5A inhibitor.
|
|
Sequence Data
|
-
|
|
|